Health
CAQ leader defends paying millions to US consulting firm during pandemic

CAQ leader defends paying millions to US consulting firm during pandemic

The political opponents of Coalition Avenir Québec Leader François Legault took aim at him on Friday after it was revealed his government awarded a major American consulting firm $35,000 a day for strategies on managing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Legault said McKinsey & Company advised the government on best practices from around the world as Quebec faced a pandemic for the first time in a century. The advice from the company “saved lives,” the CAQ leader said.

At Radio Canada investigation published Friday revealed McKinsey billed the Quebec government $6.6 million — or $35,000 a day — and played a key role in the Quebec government’s pandemic response, conducting strategy meetings and advising the government on the purchase of personal protective equipment.

The leaders of the four other main parties say the decision to award millions in sole-source contracts to the global consulting firm — and the lack of clarity on the influence it had on the Legault cabinet — reflect a broader lack of transparency in his government.

Conservative Party of Quebec Leader Éric Duhaime said he wants a public inquiry into the contracts given to McKinsey.

“It’s very concerning. How is it that a firm like this one — a foreign firm — was able to play such a large role in such a major crisis?” he told reporters outside his campaign office near Quebec City. “We have the right to know what happened.”

Radio-Canada reported that a provision in the McKinsey contract stipulated that the company would not reveal its other clients to the Quebec government — something Duhaime said creates serious concerns about conflict of interest.

The report, for instance, said another of McKinsey’s clients was COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer Pfizer and that the consulting firm was particularly involved in planning Quebec’s COVID-19 vaccination strategy and its strategic communications.

Legault says public service thing firm

Legault defended the contracts, saying that McKinsey is widely used by other governments and in the private sector.

“It’s expensive, McKinsey, but, obviously, that’s in line with the service they provide,” Legault told reporters in Amos, Que., around 600 kilometers northwest of Montreal.

The decision to award the contracts to the company came from the public service — not the cabinet — Legault said, adding that the urgency of the situation justified awarding consulting contracts without a public procurement process.

“Ultimately, it was up to me and my team to make decisions, but I think the recommendations that we received from McKinsey helped us save lives,” he said.

Other leaders react

Liberal Leader Dominique Anglade, a former McKinsey consultant, said the contracts are a sign of the Legault government’s lack of transparency.

portrait of a young man with a beard, looking serious.
Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, co-spokesperson for Québec Solidaire says there should be a public inquiry into how the province managed the pandemic. (Dany Pilote/Radio-Canada)

“The fundamental question for me is why, as Quebecers, we were not informed about this,” she told reporters in Longueuil, Que., near Montreal.

Anglade and Québec Solidaire’s co-spokesperson, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, said the McKinsey contracts are more reasons to hold a public inquiry into the province’s overall management of the pandemic.

Nadeau-Dubois also accused Legault of “privatizing” part of the province’s management of the pandemic and listening to a foreign multinational instead of Quebec health-care workers.

Earlier this year, the French Senate issued a report questioning the role played by consulting firms, including McKinsey, in the country’s pandemic response and warning that the contracts created the possibility of conflicts of interest.

In April, French prosecutors opened an investigation into tax fraud allegations against McKinsey contained in the Senate report.

In the United States, McKinsey has faced a conflict-of-interest investigation in both houses of Congress because of its role advising health regulators while also working for opioid drugmakers on boosting sales of painkillers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *